Posted by Ex on January 31, 2002 at 15:57:08:
In Reply to: I do agree with D... posted by Emily on January 31, 2002 at 09:11:53:
: I'm in a lovey dovey relationship and what-have-you. Sometimes I like sex mostly for the closeness of it, and the physical aspect is pretty far from my mind. Sometimes it's mostly for the hanky panky aspect of it, when I just want to get some. It's never JUST for my emotions, or JUST for physical pleasure.
: I don't know, Ex. I think that if you've discovered a way to transcend physical pleasure and experince sex as a purely spiritual act (actually experiencing it like this, not just talking about how you think it might be like that), than you've kind of started a new evolutionary breed of human beings and should probably submit your body to science after you die to harvest your DNA.
: Anyway, that's just my perspective from the inside, no pun intended. Sex really was a COMPLETELY different experience than what I imagined and fantasized it would be in my romantic, ideal, fourish imagination.
i don't think i ever said sex wasn't physical, what i said was that i didn't want to have sex without an emotional bond between us first, and my BELIEF is that sex in this way would be all the more satisfying. Considering sex for me would not be performed as often as those who do it ONLY for physical pleasure, i'm sure it would suit my desires just fine.
also, i never said i don't have purely sexual urges, but my own belief tells me those urges can wait for something more than just physical. i don't think it's good for someone to just go out and do what they want whenever they want, they could be missing out on something more.
just my belief
Ex