Posted by pork ^(oo)^ on April 02, 2001 at 20:11:28:
In Reply to: Re: Now that's overactive iNtuition if ever I saw it! posted by RoTtEn ApPlE on April 02, 2001 at 01:04:29:
: so why'd you want me to spell it out? (I could make you a list of my own suspicions but I rather let you give a free response.)
Nothing too interesting, actually. I just knew that if I listed that as an option, it would be too easy for you to jump at, since it made for the most complimentary scenario. I wanted to see whether you had really intended your statement ironically. (Or at least whether you would come up with that excuse yourself. ;)
It's also amusing to blatantly declare all possibile answers to a question to be incriminatory, all the while leaving out an obvious loophole. That approach is a kind of joke, I guess. Sometimes I'll feign a narrow perspective just for fun. The responses I get are often amusing, even if I'm not taken entirely seriously in this ruse.