Home  Tests  Types  Diagrams  Books  Forums  Goals  Search
Main | Type 4 | Type 5 | Movie | Care | Chat

Enneagram Movie Board Archive

Re: MBTI - controversy defining Jungs Feeling facet

Re: MBTI - controversy defining Jungs Feeling facet


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Jan's Enneagram & Movie Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Derf on November 25, 1998 at 18:47:54:

In Reply to: MBTI - controversy defining Jungs Feeling facet posted by Jan den Breejen on November 25, 1998 at 03:12:00:

Contrary to popular belief, you can't tell whether someone is a "Thinking" or a "Feeling" type by whether they wear a sweater with a big red heart on it. In fact, if more people knew how restrictive the distinction *really* is, they may be less interested in it.

Warm-hearted and cold-blooded are *not* MB/Jungian "Feeling" and "Thinking." The MB/Jung definition of these terms pertains to the way by which people come to *decisions* that they *act* upon.

Thinking: decisions based on objective values (is it practical? What is its utilitarian worth?).
Feeling: decisions based on subjective values (is it attractive? What mood does it strike in me?).

In short, it's tricky tricky tricky. Harder to determine than you might expect.

Probably more applicable to decisions that people would not be pressured, by conscience, culture, or even financial issues, into handling with their logic *or* their emotions. For instance, the choice of a carpet to put in their bedrooms. Or their description of their "ideal mate," and the reasons *why*... Or their choice of vocation, and, again, their *reasons* for that choice.

Right? Anything to add, or dissent?


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Jan's Enneagram & Movie Board ] [ FAQ ]
movieboard/messages/1498.html