Posted by Andy on December 05, 1999 at 16:54:17:
In Reply to: Re: Andy & The Joker/Jack Napier posted by Jan on December 03, 1999 at 09:42:46:
: The acting is so ugly that it gets beautifull (over the top)
:
: : Batman/Bruce Wayne E-6 - ISTP
: +++ Not E8??
Batman himself, could be an E-8, but the actor is not powerful enough.
Poor acting, simple enough. I don't have mutch to go on, but I guess
batman change hi's nr, according to who plays him...:)
By the way, that jornalist, I cant recall hi's name, are probably an E-2.
Pride shines a long way.
: : The Joker/Jack Napier E-7 - ESTP
: OK
: : Vicki Vale E-7 ENFP
: +++ goal focussed sympathetic E3??
I had the same dilemma here. So 3 or 7.....
There is very mixed oponions about 3-s and sevens.
Some says 3-s are blind and sevens got eyes.
others says 3-s can see extremely well, and that's why they can manipulate
so well, while sevens got a total filter, that prevent's them from reality.
Depending on what to buy into she is a 3 or 7.
I would say she got eyes...:) Anyway, I guess 3 could be it.
: : Carl Grissom E-8 ENTJ
: +++ An E3 eager beaver?
yes, it's eighter 3 or 8, it's a nut. I have a hard time decide.
But I would say that this is the psychopat in the movie, not jack, he's just a bad joke..
: : Alicia E-2 ESFJ
: : Alfred Pennyworth E-1 ISTJ
: +++ argh, I am an ISTJ! But I agree.
: The Batman movies are lacking E9 characters; the civil servants which Max Shreck tries to sell his nuclear power plant seem E9-ish; passive and energy-drained. Do you agree with this?
: Jan
There is one thing that is funny.
You have been calling yourself an INTJ and have moved over to ISTJ.
Congratualtions. That's a nice step in self recognition. Because you are
an ISTJ. But there is one last thing to figure out.