6/5 ISFJ Low D, Low I, High S, High C. Security type?

Subject:

Comments:
: : Come on, this is an EASY one! : : *** : : Michael tends to be a precise, systematic thinker who may prefer to follow established procedures. : : Tending to be extremely conscientious, he may use particular effort in any activities that require attention to : : detail and accuracy. He may be restrained and cautious in most everything he does. Tending to be deliberate : : and methodical, he may be very competent in doing things correctly. He may also tend to caution others to : : maintain these same standards. : : Desiring stable conditions and predictable activities, Michael may be most comfortable with a clearly : : defined work environment. He may want to know precisely what is expected of him, the time available to : : complete the activity, and the criteria for evaluation. He may tend to be very uncomfortable with uncertainty. : : He may prefer to pass up some career opportunities in exchange for a feeling of security and stability. : : Tending to have very high expectations of himself, Michael may also have similarly high expectations of : : others. In fact, he may evaluate others by very precise standards, although he may be somewhat more : : tolerant with friends. Unfortunately, these standards and expectations may be unrealistic. This may result in : : disappointment and a loss of confidence in the efforts of others. It may be important, therefore, for Michael to regularly reexamine his standards in the light of realistic expectations for the current situation. : : Still, his high standards may set an example for quality performance and pride in one's performance. : : His tendency for conscientious attention to standards can be very valuable to the organization. He naturally : : tends to be attentive to details. He tends to be willing to take the time to learn how do to a task correctly. He : : may want to know exactly how something works. However, others may find his persistent questioning and : : requests for repeated explanations and demonstrations annoying. : : Michael may tend to overuse standard operating procedures. He may be inclined to use established : : procedures in new situations. In a position of responsibility, he may want to develop written procedures for : : every aspect of an activity. He may expect others to stick to those established practices. Michael may : : also tend to be overly modest and rely heavily on the opinions of others. He may regularly solicit opinions from : : respected superiors and co-workers in order to build confidence in his own decision. : : Tending to be cautious, Michael may tend to be sensitive to tension and conflict. Desiring an : : emotionally stable environment, Michael may tend to dislike conflict and antagonism. He may prefer to : : get out of an antagonistic situation as quickly as possible. If he cannot avoid dealing with a conflict, he may : : use a diversionary approach. He may try to move to a more neutral topic, establish some common ground, or : : compliment the other person. When pressured, he may become extremely tactful and adaptable - often : : internalizing conflict rather than resolving it. : : In approaching a new problem or decision, Michael tends to rely heavily on past practices and tested : : solutions. He may solicit opinions from those around him whose judgement he respects. He may carefully : : gather and logically analyze all the information and move toward a decision, however this can be a very slow : : process. Others may become upset with the time required for Michael to decide. Once a decision has : : been made, he tends to follow through completely and accurately. He may resist making any changes until the : : initial decision has been fully implemented and tested. : : **** : : So what would you say is this man's... : : 1) Oldham style : : 2) Enneagram type : : 3) Myers-Briggs type : : 4) DISC type : : Winner gets a simple "Congratulations!" from me. ;) : : -Cory

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL: