Re: What About Non-Standard Types?

Posted by Rich on March 18, 2002 at 19:12:17:

In Reply to: Re: What About Non-Standard Types? posted by Jan on March 18, 2002 at 03:19:16:

: Hi Rich,

: I think we shouldn't try to read too much into (perhaps inaccurately acted) fictional characters, in fact I think the level of analysis of 14 Oldham styles is just right. When we try to get a level of aggregation lower the risk of making mistakes perhaps becomes to big.

: Jan
Hello Jan:
Actually, we are pretty much in agreement. I use the Riso wing types as the overview and Millon & Oldham to examine traits ( Using the Personality Styles actually helps to decide what the Riso type is, since they often seem to have some traits in common ! )I agree that to break it down too much, would leave us with a couple of hundred mini traits, and no clue as to what they adde up to! Rich

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup