|
Enneagram Type 4 Board Archive Re: Psychics are psychosPosted by Lisza on April 01, 2001 at 01:22:04: In Reply to: Psychics are psychos posted by Cory on March 31, 2001 at 20:06:12:
+++ That's possible. One example incident that happened was that my mother, who hadn't seen one of her sisters for years, and did not know that her sister was expecting a baby, dreamed one night that her sister had a baby boy. The next day her sister called her and told her the news. My mother and her sister lived in different countries, by the way.
+++ The claim that Hedonism = inferior Extraverted Sensing doesn't seem very convincing to me either. In fact a lot of the examples that many authors give to prove their point aren't very convincing. But I still think that there is some truth to the idea of inferior functions. >There's also a lot of contradiction. For example, when ExFJs act out >their Introverted Thinking there is a "hyperobsession with logic". >Interestingly enough when IxTPs act out their Extraverted Feeling, there >is a similar statement which says they overemphasize logic. Wouldn't they >be acting in COMPLETELY different ways? +++ I often read that when IxTPs are in the grip of their inferior Fe, they have strong emotional outbursts that scare everyone around them. According to Jung they also might feel unlovable and believe that no one in the world likes them. >Besides, how can we even discuss functions when no one can agree on what >they are? :) +++ I think no one agrees with each other because everyone looks from a slightly different perspective even when they're supposed to be talking about the same thing. What I always try to do is try to see from Jung's perspective, which is why I ask the kind of questions that I often ask on these boards. I once wrote a post on Jung and Myers-Briggs on the main board, suggesting that there might be a difference between Jung's perspective and the perspective of Isabel Myers and her adherents. My main interest is always first to understand Jung. In the end, I might learn that psychological functions don't exist, but that's not what's important to me, because I'm just trying to understand a particular perspective. +++ Other comments: I haven't yet gone to the link you showed me, but I will soon. What you say makes a lot of sense. Still I am open to possibilities, and no one has yet completely convinced me that there are absolutely no such possibilities out there. It's possible that one day I will come around to your way of thinking. But then I might not. You should understand that I don't completely believe in psychic phenomena, yet neither do I completely disbelieve in it. For me, many things are simply possible -- either to be true or false. I also think that many psychics aren't really psychic. It doesn't mean, however, that everyone who believe themselves to be psychic are frauds or liars. Coincidences aside, maybe something else is happening to them, and it's not as "magical" as they think. Whatever their really experiencing, I want to know if it's related to psychological functions. I think that many people would consider the youngest princess to be "intuitive". Also, many women are said to be very intuitive, and have what's often called "women's intuition." They "just know" when someone is telling a lie, or they know when something is wrong about a situation. What I want to know is whether this kind of intuition is part of the intuitive function. Lenore Thomson says that "women's intuition" is not really intuition in the Jungian sense, and I suspect that too, but I want to know other people's views. Also I found it strange that it's usually (but not always) sensing types, especially sensing feeling types, who have these "intuitions". Or maybe it's because when sensing types have these intuitions they experience is as a mysterious "feeling", whereas when an intuitve experiences it often appears as if he or she is "thinking". Well, sarcasm or whatever, I appreciate you expressing your views.
|
|