We're all bisexual agnostics!

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Type 4 Message Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Amy on October 30, 1999 at 14:09:47:

In Reply to: Sexuality of a 4 posted by Anonymous on October 29, 1999 at 17:45:05:

According to Claudio Naranjo ("Character and Neurosis"), fours are the most likely type to be homosexual. I believe that everyone has the potential to be bisexual, but maybe that's just my fourishness. (And we're all agnostics in the sense that none of us are sure about God.)

Amy

Follow Ups:

2's are bi-sexual! haha, get it? Uh sorry....read this post Cory 17:40:23 10/30/99 (2)
- I wasn't trying to be all that profound, really! Amy 10:32:26 10/31/99 (0)
- What does the last clause mean? Tiggy 18:48:17 10/30/99 (0)
Re: We're all bisexual agnostics! Karen 15:42:35 10/30/99 (11)
- The chicken or the egg--who knows? (nt) Amy 10:33:39 10/31/99 (10)
  - Re: The chicken or the egg--who knows? Karen 12:11:29 10/31/99 (9)
    - Re: The chicken or the egg--who knows? Amy 16:13:04 11/02/99 (0)
    - What's a diathesis? NT Tigs. 13:04:05 10/31/99 (7)
      - Re: What's a diathesis? Karen 13:23:39 10/31/99 (6)
        
        Re: What's a diathesis? Ev 17:02:21 10/31/99 (5)
        
        Re: What's a diathesis? Tiggy. 19:42:40 10/31/99 (3)
        
        healthy sexual relationships Amy 16:29:22 11/02/99 (2)
        
        unhealthy relationships. Tigs. 20:00:11 11/02/99 (1)
        
        Re: unhealthy relationships. Amy 17:23:42 11/03/99 (0)
        
        Being proactive Karen 18:02:56 10/31/99 (0)
Speak for yourself! Amanda :) 14:40:35 10/30/99 (5)
- Re: Speak for yourself! Amy 10:26:25 10/31/99 (3)
  - Yes, but.... Amanda :) 11:41:15 10/31/99 (2)
    - Re: Yes, but.... Amy 16:34:53 11/02/99 (0)
    - She doesn't sound like an agnostic to me! Tigs. 12:02:19 10/31/99 (0)
- Re: Speak for yourself! (God, twins!) Tigs. 16:19:31 10/30/99 (0)

Post a Followup