Posted by pork on January 30, 2000 at 19:26:57:
In Reply to: Re: Type 4 Rare or Common? posted by Heather on January 30, 2000 at 17:33:13:
It seems you're defining the type too narrowly. Same for 5. What book have you been reading, anyway?
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
Subject:
Comments: : It seems you're defining the type too narrowly. Same for 5. What book have you been reading, anyway?
Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: