Enneagram Type 5 Board Archive

Re: O.K. [ Boards: Main, Type4, Type5, Movie, Care, Chat ][ Top 10 ] [ HOME ]

Re: O.K.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Type 5 Message Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by pork ^(oo)^ on March 25, 2001 at 12:40:08:

In Reply to: Re: O.K. posted by RoTtEn ApPlE on March 25, 2001 at 04:58:06:

: It is highly unlikely that a type 5 will be prefer Feeling over Thinking.

That seems to be the general opinion, and I'll accept that propaganda for now, though I'm always careful to keep an open mind. I once thought the 5-F combination was practically impossible, too, until I starting having surprise insights into what appeared to be exceptions.

You raise an interesting question to me: Which "geometrical figures" (Platonic "absolute forms?") representing the nature of a type are universal (though slightly fortifiable, I suppose, in consideration of individuality)? My current view: probably none of them, though the majority of them should apply in order for one to be referred to as a particular type.

Later,

^(oo)^

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: : It is highly unlikely that a type 5 will be prefer Feeling over Thinking. : That seems to be the general opinion, and I'll accept that propaganda for now, though I'm always careful to keep an open mind. I once thought the 5-F combination was practically impossible, too, until I starting having surprise insights into what appeared to be exceptions. : You raise an interesting question to me: Which "geometrical figures" (Platonic "absolute forms?") representing the nature of a type are universal (though slightly fortifiable, I suppose, in consideration of individuality)? My current view: probably none of them, though the majority of them should apply in order for one to be referred to as a particular type. : Later, : ^(oo)^

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Type 5 Message Board ] [ FAQ ] type5board/messages/2499.html

Your Ad Here