Posted by K.B. on March 27, 2001 at 04:37:07:
In Reply to: Don't complexify the simple things... posted by Cory on March 27, 2001 at 00:51:01:
: Fact: Emily is well-known on the board for her silliness and self centered posts.
: Fact: The person behind Cory is a jealous attention-seeker.
: Fact: When insecure, the jealous personality seeks to get drunk and mar others intelligent posts.
: It's not about "flashpoints" or having "a lot of 1", it's just that people are amazed by Emily's track record of perfect obstinacy.
: I think Cory is bullshit. Cory is pretty much mindless and wants to suck up to that sacred cow. I would trust you to mar this board too so that my theory can be deleted and you do this to protect someone who is too ugly for you and you are too ugly for her. Anyone who has for YEARS been living his life on a cultish message board won't be honest but will run to protect a fearful leader....Who can really trust any conclusions from a warped mind like that?
Just like a frigging cult, the leader gives the order and the sap goes and does the bidding. "OH CORY. I DON'T WANT K.B. TO KNOW I READ HIS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT ANALYSIS OR TO LET OTHERS GET A CHANCE TO KNOW THE TRUTH. GO AND MESS UP THE FIVE BOARD SO I CAN GET BECCA TO DELETE IT". I now realize what you and many others here are. You introverts are a bunch of gutless pack rats led by two twenty five cent stalin or hitlers that you never met and who could be who knows?
: You can explain this whole situation, no matter WHAT numbers are in Emily's makeup. Let's say you both had a mutual 3 flashpoint, instead of 6. We could say that you both had a desire to be the most popular and clashed at that.
So? Of course you can explain it that way if we both had 3 flashpoints. And you explain it the way I did since we both have 6 flashpoints plus etc.
: But what's the use of explaining rational logic to a nut?
Right! You are a drunk and dope addict who is going to wind up in a gutter and then in some vermin infested halfway house and when you do........... THINK OF ME MOTHERFUCKER AND WISH YOU HAD A BIG BROTHER LIKE K.B.
: -Cory
:
: : To explain further about why Emily and K.B./Ferrantino could not get along------------ Both K.B. and "Nick" had strong 1's and both {Talking here about the Summer of 2000 "Nick Ferrantino" and not the comic one} often used terms such as "should" and "ought to" in their messages. It isn't to say that the {noted to be 1 deficient} Emily would usually have a problem with ones but that............. This strong 1 side was combined with a highly strong and sure tone. The views were not views that Emily held or was comfortable with and in combination with the sure and expert way of conveying these views, made an anti-one like Emily uncomfortable.
: : It is analogous to putting a fundamentalist preacher of right and wrong thinking and conservative views next to an introverted to ambiverted atheist on a long distance plane ride. The preacher will thunder of morality to the {not recognized as} atheist who is on the way to a sexually oriented vacation until finally.................... But of course certain atheists will give the preacher an intellectual/religious debate that would stimulate and help both parties to verbalize their positions better.
: : In this case, the flashpoint six of both Emily and "my guys" helped to make this desired result impossible.
: : My flashpoints are six and eight and I have a low 2 while Emily's flashpoints were six and two and she has a low 8. Thus my style is to go right after the other person and try to debate it and get it settled while Emily's style is to use a more slippy approach. To use a nasty or cutting sentence somewhere in an otherwise gentle reply that indicates to both our high and sensitive fours that all is NOT well.
: : Since her 8 and my 2 are both very low, neither of us could appreciate or effectively counter the other way of fighting and in fact were adverse to each others methods. Now Mikko is an 8 and my wife is a 2 and Emily gets along with Mikko as I do with my wife but it is due to mutual respect and lack of conflict in both cases. In the case of Emily and "K.B." however........ what had been a peaceful yet shaky coexistence turned into conflict when I unwittingly used a term for posters {Quirky denizens which only meant " members of the board that were unpredictable and whimsical"} that Emily misunderstood to be a "criticism" and "insult". One thing led to another and soon it escalated with Mikko jumping in.
: : The mutual 6 flashpoint assured that neither of us would trust each other and each of our style of fighting was hitting the other ones weaker and less developed side so that neither of us understood each other.
: : Flashpoint BTW is midpoint or "the middle score or scores of a person's test result". It is the area where each person is most sensitive and it serves to "protect" the highest type of the person from feeling and using the lower part of his or her "type spectrum".
: : Emily's high four has a middle two {stress point} and low one. Thus she tends to find stress in her life while trying to avoid it. {High nine}. Her nine doesn't move {being high on both test results that I saw} but her other flashpoint of six is also trouble? for her. Not really since her six pushes her three up {when her six is sparked} to the pushing down of her five. This is a good thing for her although she may resist it. Her five has low seven and eight but her six can spark that three into a high position.
: : Six wants to go to nine and not three so initial conflict when the six is sparked. But the nine welcomes the three's arrival to the near top. It indicates that Emily's more extroverted side is being held back by distrust and phobic thinking. Perhaps a fear of people and of being disliked which was also a subject that I brought up and it certainly hit too close to home for her.
: :