Posted by TiresomeSolipsist on January 31, 2002 at 21:37:13:
In Reply to: Poh tay toe Poh taaah toe posted by Diarmuid on January 31, 2002 at 04:02:07:
: : Very few have the discipline to organize thier life around a philosophy but they are the ones who matter, and who end up controling most of the activities of everyone else.
: Ah, but I suggest they don't organize their lives around a philosophy: they organize their philosophy around their lives. Or in Isaac's case: they choose a philosophy which was invented by a person very similar to them in personality structure, i.e: a five.
: Also, Buddhist monks are fairly sucessful in living their lives according to a strict philosophy, but they are not particularly powerful. Very few non-Buddhists think they matter.
: This tends to disprove your point and kind of diminishes mine. I call this Diarmuid's Law: "Every generally valid principle in human affairs will have at least one exception."
: Y'know, it's a generally valid principle that humans don't like to hammer nails into their own genitals. But you could probably find a website with people who do just that. But generally, that maxim holds true for everybody you meet in the course of a typical day.
>>>> Diar, got to get straight on point two before I'll go any farther with the above.
: : Another point - to say philosophy does not matter is self cancelling.
: "All generalizations are dangerous, even this one." -- Alexandre Dumas
>>> Hmmm sounds like Diarmuid's law to me, or maybe the other way around. Niether one holds valid in this case. We are not discussing a maxim regarding human varients but a case of logical inconsistency within a well defined system, the system being logical debate.