Accept diversity among systems as you accept diversity among human beings (?)

Posted by Derf on October 31, 1999 at 22:31:58:

In Reply to: E-type correlation with Kingma's "9 Types of Loves" posted by Cecil on October 31, 1999 at 19:36:35:

I'm sick of seeing all this "correlation" BS. This mindset is a direct reflection, it seems, of our unfortunate tendency to stuff everything new into existing molds, even if we have to (a) stretch standards, facts and truths, (b) throw out common sense, and (c) eliminate, in our minds, the possibility that human beings may be various and interesting, in order to achieve this paramount end.

So, I have a more interesting idea:

Attention-Seeker: any type
Emoter: any type
Cool Cucumber: any type
Skeptic: any type
Workaholic: any type
Perfectionist: any type
Fantasizer: any type
Controller: any type
People Pleaser: any type

Furthermore, to end another long (and incredibly stupid) debate:

ENTP: any type
INTP: any type
ENTJ: any type
INTJ: any type
ESTP: any type
ISTP: any type
ESFP: any type
ISFP: any type
ESTJ: any type
ISTJ: any type
ESFJ: any type
ISFJ: any type
ENFP: any type
INFP: any type
ENFJ: any type
INFJ: any type

You can't find correlations unless you resort - and stick - to cartoon cliches. You can do this crap if you want to. I'll be in another room. :>

Derf

Follow Ups:

• Ok, here is a rational explanation Cory 13:37:03 11/01/99 (3)
  • Re: Ok, here is a rational explanation Derf 14:48:58 11/01/99 (2)
    • Re: Ok, here is a rational explanation Cory 15:30:53 11/01/99 (1)
      • Re: Ok, here is a rational explanation Derf 19:06:10 11/01/99 (0)

Post a Followup