Being question

Posted by Karen on March 30, 2000 at 12:21:41:

I find myself increasingly uncomfortable saying that I *am* a certain type-I *am* 4 or I *am* 5- because...well, because none of us is *identical* to our types. I who am I am not the same as any personality I might manifest. I feel concerned that repeatedly saying I *am* a certain type will just reinforce the identification. Does this make sense? So what I'm looking for is a different way of stating type. I'm manifesting 4? Expressing 5? Doing? Having? Does anyone have a concise, accurate, elegant way of stating type that avoids an identity statement? Or any other comments?

Thanks.

Follow Ups:

• Re: Being question Maverick 17:13:00 03/30/00 (1)
  • You could say..... Tiggy 17:43:13 03/30/00 (0)
• Palmer says, 'at Four', I'm 'at Five'?. nt Tiggy 16:29:16 03/30/00 (0)
• Say, "My enneatype is 4" Emily [nt] 13:21:49 03/30/00 (1)
  • Hi, I am prone to sloth and have an over-adjusted personality Brian (Peacemaker-preservationist-mediator) C. 13:37:54 03/30/00 (0)

Post a Followup