Posted by K.B. on October 30, 2000 at 11:53:22:
In Reply to: Re: To Freddie (a.k.a. "From Freddie") posted by Freddie on October 30, 2000 at 01:50:19:
> > As I read your post, Freddie, I remembered a system that classifies people as being visually oriented, aurally oriented etc. Some pick up clues on sight, others by sound, smell etc. Its also interesting that you don't believe people can type others by description. I strongly doubt anyone can read many people's type on first sight.
> Is it possibly we both may be right about ourselves and wrong about the other? Actually, I feel its easier logically{this is my opinion and not a fact} to read another if you are given his whole spectrum-his test scores from best to worst in order, than it is to read someone on surface clues or even body language. You may be gifted visually, Freddie and may be able to do this, I don't doubt your belief that you can.
> In your post, you wrote about "two different 4w5's being two different types in love". Of course I agree with you. I was writing in my post about the FULL scale from highest to lowest. I believe we need the entire results when analyzing Enneagram or Myers/Briggs results. And that's what I asked for: The entire results and I gave them in my second 4w5/2w1 post.
> > If you or anyone would like to analyze my post or would like to see if I can read a relationship by the juxtaposing of two people's entire score, I would like to hear from you. I'm not claiming any great ability, but I'm just curious to see if it can be done and if I can do it. Thanks, K.B.