Posted by Lisa on October 30, 2000 at 22:10:47:
In Reply to: Re: Ok posted by Cory on October 28, 2000 at 21:39:15:
> > > 1w9: Phlegmatic with Choleric
> > But that's my type and I've tested as melancholy with choleric a close second. Phlegmatic is much further behind. This is according to "Personality Plus" by Florence Littauer. Good book. And choleric and phlegmatic are opposite temperaments so its rare for them to coexist. Does phlegmatic with choleric mean that phlegmatic is more dominant than choleric.
> By Phlegmatic, I mean someone like Al Gore. Even though Ones are full of anger, they typically repress all their other emotions (think 1, 3, 5 triad). I haven't read anything Extensive on the ancient temperaments however, so these were tentative speculations.
>
> > > 1w2: Choleric with Phlegmatic
> > > 2w1: Phlegmatic with Sanguine or Melancholic
> > > 2w3: Sanguine
> > > 3w2: Sanguine with Phlegmatic
> > > 3w4: Phlegmatic with Melancholic
> > 3 doesn't seem phlegmatic to me. Of the four temperaments I'd say phlegmatic cares the least about image and success but image and success is what three is all about.
> 1, 3, 5 triad again. 3w2 is definitely Sanguine, and 3w4 could be Sanguine/Melancholic?
> > > 4w3: Melancholic with Sanguine or Choleric
> > > 4w5: Melancholic with Phlegmatic
> > > 5w4: Phlegmatic with Melancholic
> > > 5w6: Phlegmatic
> > > 6w5: Choleric with Phlegmatic
> > > 6w7: Choleric with Sanguine
> > > 7w6: Sanguine with Melancholic
> > > 7w8: Sanguine with Choleric
> > > 8w7: Choleric with Sanguine
> > > 8w9: Choleric with Phlegmatic
> > > 9w8: Phlegmatic with Choleric
> > > 9w1: Phlegmatic with Melancholic
> > > -Cory
> > Except for a couple, these seem like reasonable guesses.
> You mean to say that some of mine were unreasonable guesses?
> -Cory