Posted by Riv on May 29, 2001 at 21:06:17:
In Reply to: That's all very well... posted by Harley on May 28, 2001 at 19:23:29:
> > The question is... are 9s or 2s the dumbest? My money's on 2.
> But if they're cunning as a shithouse rat, they can still be dangerous and quite powerful within organisations (I have been there, it was not nice).
Was Ethel Mertz of I Love Lucy a 2? In her role she played a catty and helpful social type. I saw some episodes where she played an important role read powerful role in women's organizations. Yes, this show stereotyped women, men, Latins and everyone else and unwittingly stereotyped 2's 3's 4's and 6's, but it still sounds like you are describing Ethel Mertz prototypes.
_Riv