|
Enneagram Main Board Archive Re: Do fast cars compensate for a small penis?Posted by Ant (62.49.6.39) on December 19, 2002 at 15:26:25: In Reply to: Do fast cars compensate for a small penis? posted by Cory (65.151.223.190) on May 25, 2002 at 22:01:52: > Yes. > I drive a 4-cylinder 102-hp 1995 Honda Civic. It's slow, but it LOOKS cool! It's white. Has a spoiler. Lowered. Futuristic wheels. Tinted windows. It *HAD* an awesome Pioneer stereo until some asshole broke into my car and stole it. I love my car...why? I like to zoom in and out of traffic, I like to look cool, GOD I LOVE TO IMPRESS PEOPLE! > My girlfriend says I'm too SELFISH...ALL I THINK ABOUT IS MYSELF and when I get right down to it, she's absolutely right. I use her. For sex, help, friendship, and all that other stuff that is expected of a wife/companion. I use her, just like she uses me for her needs. > It's so hypocritical when people say "You're using me!" Yea? No shit! And you're using me for your own desire to be loved by someone...BITCH! > But I don't think so harshly towards Jessica. After all, it's our human destiny to procreate and both of us have finished our supposed life's goals. But that nihilistic Darwinianism leaves a bad taste in my mouth which I freely substitute with the taste of a Strawberry Daiquiri or a hard straight-up shot of Tequila. There must be more to life than tending to your family and work... > And when I get next to that '94 Mitsubishi Eclipse at the stop light, I floor the pedal and let my cold air intake scream its name out into the night? Why do I like street racing? It's fun, it's competetitive, it's stylish. My car is so cute. If she was a woman, I'd fuck her. > So anyways, humans have been asking WHAT IS THE MEANING OF LIFE for centuries and some morons turned to "God" and others to he bottle and I don't know which is worse, but either way you get screwed. Maybe the secret of life is nothing even attainable, in fact, maybe the secret of life is not the GOAL but the PATH... > I should be a Zen Master...if only Buddhism's complex, boring discourse didn't put me off. > So enough about NF stuff (Life's Purpose!) Lets talk about NT stuff.... > Ok so if you had a tank with unlimited ammo and fuel, could you take over the world in 1200 AD? I mean, everyone around you would have just swords and shields and what good is THAT gonna do to 40 ton steel tank? Hell, you could raze whole castles with just a few shots of your 30mm cannon! You would travel all over Europe and bring down entire armies! RUN OVER THE WOUNDED!!!! Blow off Horses heads with your machine gun. Give that freakin' knight the time of his life as your projectiles slice him in half! > so i think it is very possible that you could take over the world) in the year 1200 but when would the tme frame end? I know you couldnt do it in 1800AD! They had cannons and explosives and al that good stuff. Maybe 1700? Were the cannons powerful enough to do some damage to the tank? > > POLITICS > Thus, politics has been always naturally RIGHT-WING. You could even make an argument that Soviet Russia was right-wing. Was that a FAIR AND LIBERAL SOCIETY? I think not. Fascism in new clothes. Marx was a left-wing liberal. Mao, Stalin, and the like were not. Why would a person in power wish to usurp themselves? Why would those in power give the power to the people? The only reason why the ELITE would invest in the people is if theres a payoff for them. Democracy works because it keeps the elite where they want to be. > That is true politics. > -Cory I think that u couldnt take over the world on 1200AD because how would u cross ociens etc. in a tank? Maybe if it was an amphibious tank... Maybe then.
|
|