Re: SERIAL KILLER ???-Retraction


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Enneagram Message Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Perciever on February 18, 1999 at 09:54:04:

In Reply to: Re: SERIAL KILLER ??? posted by Perciever on February 18, 1999 at 09:26:28:

> > what about SERIAL KILLERS of note???
> > are they 1s?.. 9s? (some like Jeffrey Dahmer would be 9s, killing for "company",cannibalism, etc)
> > I also know some pretty scary 3s who really get off on sick violence.
> > Bundy could've been a 3 I think..
> > any ideas anyone???

> Well Riso Lists Dahmer as a 3. OJ Simpson is a 3. And Bundy. Unibomber a 5. The prisons
> are filled with 8's.
> The biggest in-your-face psychos are from the 1-9-8 triad. Sixes and 5's are more sneaky.
> The package bomb and dagger in the night.
> Twos and fours are given to really weird stuff like poisoning a family member with arsenic
> while taking care of them.

*****
Brian C. is correct, no type is more given to deviance than another. All types have levels of health
and unhealth. It is interesting to note the radical behaviors demonstrated in levels of unhealth,
however there is a danger in stereotyping and looking for the negatives. Every person is unique and
must be treated so.



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Enneagram Message Board ] [ FAQ ]