Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone

Posted by Hunter Brooks on February 16, 1998 at 21:17:21:

In Reply to: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone posted by Derf on February 16, 1998 at 20:46:11:

Hmm....

but why use the shape: it's become meaningless. Just read the book by AGE Blake, and you'll see the number of silly astrolgical things are ruined by symmetry.

Maybe Becca's on to something.

I resented, however, the 1-5-6 order.

I see a 3-5-4-2-9-1-6-7-8 order of a "wings" system.

Follow Ups:

• Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone Derf 21:23:36 2/16/98 (6)
  • Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone Hunter Brooks 22:19:47 2/16/98 (5)
    • Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone Derf 23:05:25 2/16/98 (4)
      • Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone Hunter Brooks 15:55:59 2/17/98 (2)
        • Warning: very short message Derf 21:04:26 2/17/98 (1)
          • Apology for previous post and then the whole little "but I was right!" complex. Hunter Brooks 18:00:44 2/18/98 (0)
      • Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone John DiFool (4w5) 00:51:43 2/17/98 (0)

Post a Followup