Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone

Posted by Derf on February 16, 1998 at 21:23:36:

In Reply to: Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone posted by Hunter Brooks on February 16, 1998 at 21:17:21:

It doesn't HAVE to be symmetrical; just make some lines longer than others.... OK, just call me "Romantic"; I'll stick with this beautiful shape until I see a system with an ugly shape that *really* convinces me - at the CORE level (which is greater than appearances, but unfortunately, much of the "neogram" seems based on them). Cheers and happy everythings despite the fact that I'm not quite certain about *anything*!

Follow Ups:

• Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone Hunter Brooks 22:19:47 2/16/98 (5)
  • Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone Derf 23:05:25 2/16/98 (4)
    • Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone Hunter Brooks 15:55:59 2/17/98 (2)
      • Warning: very short message Derf 21:04:26 2/17/98 (1)
        • Apology for previous post and then the whole little "but I was right!" complex. Hunter Brooks 18:00:44 2/18/98 (0)
    • Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone John DiFool (4w5) 00:51:43 2/17/98 (0)

Post a Followup