Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone

Posted by Hunter Brooks on February 16, 1998 at 22:19:47:

In Reply to: Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone posted by Derf on February 16, 1998 at 21:23:36:

Well, anyway, go to a library and read blake's book. You'll discover the meaninglessness of
the happy one.

And why not change the numbers alltogether and keep the symmetry?

You know, like make 1 the acheiver; 2 the observer; etc.

then would you be happy?

Of course, enneagram does mean "drawing of nine" so it is the shape which we refer to.

Follow Ups:

• Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone Derf 23:05:25 2/16/98 (4)
  • Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone Hunter Brooks 15:55:59 2/17/98 (2)
    • Warning: very short message Derf 21:04:26 2/17/98 (1)
      • Apology for previous post and then the whole little "but I was right!" complex. Hunter Brooks 18:00:44 2/18/98 (0)
  • Re: This is just a start - I'm not trying to write anything in stone John DiFool (4w5) 00:51:43 2/17/98 (0)

Post a Followup