|
Enneagram Main Board Archive Re: Meeting GOD via the enneagramPosted by Dave on April 30, 1999 at 08:06:16: In Reply to: Re: Meeting GOD via the enneagram posted by Tal on April 29, 1999 at 19:33:40:
> Let's take the first triad, which you say is comprised of types which approach the 'God of Philosophers'. If I understand you correctly (correct me if I'm wrong) you mean these types approach a God whose nature can be described or understood (to an extent) philosophically and so is more of an abstract concept than anything else. I think you run into the biggest problem when you lump 5's and 6's approach together. IMHO 5's and 6's reflect completely opposite ways of thinking, especially as pertains to matters such as God. I would agree that 5's generally seek the most reasonable explanation, and tend towards cold hard facts (hence the prevalence of 5 atheists), but 6's are the opposite of that--they embrace a conception of authority simply because it's authority, not because it happens to be reasonable. A six subordinates himself to God because he believes in God's omnipotence and power over matters; philosophical underpinnings are largely irrelevant. Sixes believe in the "laws of nature" in the sense that they look at whatever happens to be their belief as immovable and concrete, but that's largely out of fear of the structure collapsing under them, not out of philosophical considerations. I don't think you can ever lump 5 and 6's approach together (to me they represent the epitome of either end of the nature of belief). As for 6's, authority is not their sole way of being. Questioning and doubt is more the issue with alot of 6's, because many have lost faith in any authority, and they follow authority only temporarily. Eventually they look for systems and laws to give them a sense of certainty. But, eventually they end up doubting that too. Therefore, since living beings can't be trusted, they don't look for a living God as a being, but rather as a process. It's similar to 5's in this regard. > Then take the feeling center; to say these type view God in terms of relationship is misleading too, I think. The best approximation I can think of this is to say that their mentality towards God is one of give and take: "if I do this and that and it makes God happy, God will take care of me". It seems toi me Feeling center people relate to God best as a person. You can relate to a person, not a process. You can't have a meaningfull personal relationship with a process. As for Fours, I don't think Fours fit very well into this dynamic. I think Fours tend more to have a sense of connection to God through artistic or creative mediums, or through beauty. But conversely Fours are almost always nihilistic when depressed. > Type 8 is interesting. The notion of an 8 believing in God is a paradox in itself: 8's hate submission, and most conceptions of God unfortunately involve submission to a large extent. I liked the way DEECEE summed it up in his reply to your post when he said that he believes in God when he wants to, not when God wants. That's typical of 8's; I agree with you when you say that they relate to God through force of will, but I think 8's capacity to submit in any case is stunted. When they 'believe' they're internalising the authority of God more than anything.
Assuming that God is always present to meet with, then if God seems distant, who moved? The enneagram shows us how we moved away (in our perception), and how to move back. In the end I see that there are 3 ways to approach God: 1. As a person, which is the easist since we already know how to meet and relate with people. > That leaves 7's, whose view of God is largely of a big guy in the sky who likes wine and cheese and encourages them do whatever they want :) DAve
|
|