Posted by Michael on April 11, 1998 at 16:40:56:
In Reply to: Re: TIME leaders and revolutionaries posted by Copperhead on April 11, 1998 at 00:51:11:
: : Hmmmm...No TWOS , THREES or FOURS as LEADERS. I can understand the TWO and FOUR but I thought thered be a THREE someplace???
: Your observation is important -
Not sure the article is meant to be an 'end all' of leaders. Just because
there's no 2, 3 or 4 on the list doesn't tell me that there are none of
those types as leaders. (Didn't read the article by the way, just can't
believe the conclusion can be drawn)