Re: Myers-Briggs

Posted by Geenius at Wrok on April 27, 1998 at 22:08:13:

In Reply to: Re: Myers-Briggs posted by Dave on April 26, 1998 at 09:16:49:

: : The problem (as I see it) with Myers-Briggs types is that variability is
: : built-in: the ultimate goal is to bring all of one's imbalances into
: : balance, effectively becoming NO type.

: That is the ultimate goal of the Eneeagram too!

Er, I don't think enneagram theory embraces "no-type-ness" the same way
Myers-Briggs typology does. Even if you believe going all the way around
the diagram to be the ultimate goal of self-development, leaving one's
original type completely behind would be like having climbing to the top
of a ladder only to find that the bottom of it has come unstuck from the
ground and bent around to meet you. You're always rooted somewhere.

Follow Ups:

• Re: Myers-Briggs Dave 07:32:04 4/28/98 (0)

Post a Followup